Lester & Lester v. Fowler
43 Ga. 190
Opinion
It was error in the Court in not sustaining the plaintiffs’ certiorari and ordering a new trial in the Justice’s Court.
Let the judgment of the Court below be reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lester & Lester v. Fowler, 43 Ga. 190 (Ga. 1871).
43 Ga. 190 (Lester & Lester v. Fowler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Standard Oil Company
180 S.E.2d 691 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Thomas v. Eason
69 S.E.2d 729 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Lee v. Garland
66 S.E.2d 223 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Roberts v. Investors Savings Co.
113 S.E. 398 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Krueger v. Simmons
95 S.E. 718 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Dixon v. Bond
88 S.E. 825 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Probasco v. Shaw
87 S.E. 466 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)
Pryor v. Ludden & Bates Southern Music House
67 S.E. 654 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Lunsford, Maxwell & Co. v. Malsby & Avery
28 S.E. 496 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)
Stafford v. Staunton
14 S.E. 479 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1892)
Turner v. Rives
75 Ga. 606 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1886)
Pitts v. Allen
72 Ga. 69 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1883)