Lester James as Grandparent and Legal Guardian of K.J., a Minor Child v. Lyon County; a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; Lyon County Sheriff Deputy Doe 1 Taylor Cunningham; State of Nevada on relation of the Department of Public Safety, Highway Patrol Division; Nevada State Police Highway Patrol Officer Doe 2; Nevada State Police Highway Patrol Officer Doe 3; and Does 4

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedOctober 1, 2025
Docket3:24-cv-00247
StatusUnknown

This text of Lester James as Grandparent and Legal Guardian of K.J., a Minor Child v. Lyon County; a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; Lyon County Sheriff Deputy Doe 1 Taylor Cunningham; State of Nevada on relation of the Department of Public Safety, Highway Patrol Division; Nevada State Police Highway Patrol Officer Doe 2; Nevada State Police Highway Patrol Officer Doe 3; and Does 4 (Lester James as Grandparent and Legal Guardian of K.J., a Minor Child v. Lyon County; a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; Lyon County Sheriff Deputy Doe 1 Taylor Cunningham; State of Nevada on relation of the Department of Public Safety, Highway Patrol Division; Nevada State Police Highway Patrol Officer Doe 2; Nevada State Police Highway Patrol Officer Doe 3; and Does 4) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lester James as Grandparent and Legal Guardian of K.J., a Minor Child v. Lyon County; a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; Lyon County Sheriff Deputy Doe 1 Taylor Cunningham; State of Nevada on relation of the Department of Public Safety, Highway Patrol Division; Nevada State Police Highway Patrol Officer Doe 2; Nevada State Police Highway Patrol Officer Doe 3; and Does 4, (D. Nev. 2025).

Opinion

1 Katherine F. Parks, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6227 2 Thorndal Armstrong, PC 6590 S. McCarran Blvd., Suite B 3 Reno, Nevada 89509 Tel: (775) 786-2882 4 kfp@thorndal.com Attorney for Defendants 5 LYON COUNTY and TAYLOR CUNNINGHAM 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 Lester James as Grandparent and Legal Guardian of K.J., a Minor Child, 11 Plaintiff, Case No. 3:24-cv-00247-ART-CSD 12 vs. 13 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Lyon County; a political subdivision of the 14 State of Nevada; Lyon County Sheriff Deputy Doe 1 Taylor Cunningham; State of Nevada 15 on relation of the Department of Public Safety, Highway Patrol Division; Nevada 16 State Police Highway Patrol Officer Doe 2; Nevada State Police Highway Patrol Officer 17 Doe 3; and Does 4 through 10, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 20 In order to protect the confidentiality of confidential information obtained by the parties 21 identified in the above caption in connection with this case, the parties hereby agree as follows: 22 1. Any party may designate as “confidential” (by stamping the relevant page or 23 otherwise as set forth herein) any document or response to discovery which that party or non- 24 party considers in good faith to contain confidential information, subject to protection under the 25 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or state or federal law (“Confidential Information”). Where a 26 document or response consists of more than one page, the first page and each page on which 27 confidential information appears shall be so designated. 28 1 2. A party may designate information disclosed during a deposition or in response 2 to written discovery as “confidential” by so indicating in said response or a party may designate 3 in writing, within twenty (20) days after receipt of said responses or of the deposition transcript 4 for which the designation is proposed, that specific pages of the transcript and/or specific 5 responses be treated as “confidential” information. Any other party may object to such proposal, 6 in writing or on the record. Upon such objection, the parties shall follow the procedures 7 described in paragraph 8 below. After any designation made according to the procedure set 8 forth in this paragraph, the designated documents or information shall be treated according to the 9 designation until the matter is resolved according to the procedures described in paragraph 8 10 below, and counsel for all parties shall be responsible for marking all previously unmarked 11 copies of the designated material in their possession or control with the specific designation. 12 3. All information produced or exchanged in the course of this case (other than 13 information that is publicly available) shall be used by the party or parties to whom the 14 information is produced solely for the purpose of this case. 15 4. Except with the prior written consent of the party or parties who designated the 16 material “Confidential Information,” or upon the prior order of this Court obtained upon notice 17 to opposing counsel, Confidential Information shall not be disclosed to any person other than: 18 (a) counsel for the respective parties to this litigation, including in-house counsel and 19 co-counsel retained for this litigation; 20 (b) employees of such counsel; 21 (c) individual parties, class representatives, any officer or employee of a party, to the 22 extent deemed necessary by Counsel for the prosecution or defense of this litigation; 23 (d) consultants or expert witnesses retained for the prosecution or defense of this 24 litigation, provided that each such person shall execute a copy of the Certification annexed to this 25 Order as Exhibit “A” (which shall be retained by counsel to the party so disclosing the 26 Confidential Information and made available for inspection by opposing counsel during the 27 pendency or after the termination of the action only upon good cause shown and upon order of 28 the Court) before being shown or given any Confidential Information; 1 (e) any authors or recipients of the Confidential Information; 2 (f) the Court, Court personnel, and court reporters; and 3 (g) witnesses (other than persons described in paragraph 4(e)). A witness shall sign 4 the Certification before being shown a confidential document. Confidential Information may be 5 disclosed to a witness who will not sign the Certification only in a deposition at which the party 6 who designated the Confidential Information is represented or has been given notice that 7 Confidential Information shall be designated “Confidential” pursuant to paragraph 2 above. 8 Witnesses shown Confidential Information shall not be allowed to retain copies. 9 5. Any persons receiving Confidential Information shall not reveal or discuss such 10 information to or with any person who is not entitled to receive such information, except as set 11 forth herein. 12 6. Unless otherwise permitted by statute, rule or prior court order, papers filed with 13 the Court under seal shall be accompanied by a concurrently filed motion for leave to file those 14 documents under seal, and shall be filed consistent with the court’s electronic filing procedures 15 in accordance with Local Rule IA 10-5. Notwithstanding any agreement among the parties, the 16 party seeking to file a paper under seal bears the burden of overcoming the presumption in favor 17 of public access to papers filed in court. Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.2d 18 1172 (9th Cir. 2006) and Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC., 809 F.3d 1092, 1097 19 (9th Cir. 2016). 20 7. A party may designate as “Confidential” documents or discovery materials 21 produced by a non-party by providing written notice to all parties of the relevant document 22 numbers of other identification within thirty (30) days after receiving such documents or 23 discovery materials. Any party or non-party may voluntarily disclose to others without 24 restriction any information designated by that party or non-party as confidential, although a 25 document may lose its confidential status if it is made public. 26 8. If a party contends that any material is not entitled to confidential treatment, such 27 party may at any time give written notice to the party or non-party who designated the material. 28 The party or non-party who designated the material shall have twenty-five (25) days from the 1 receipt of such written notice to apply to the Court for an order designating the material as 2 confidential. The party seeking the order has the burden of establishing that the document is 3 entitled to protection. 4 9. Notwithstanding any challenge to the designation of material as Confidential 5 Information, all documents shall be treated as such and shall be subject to the provisions hereof 6 unless and until one of the following occurs: 7 (a) the party who claims that the material is Confidential Information withdraws 8 such designation in writing; or 9 (b) the party who claims that the material is Confidential Information fails to apply to 10 the Court for an order designating the material confidential within the time period specified 11 above after receipt of a written challenge to such designation; or 12 (c) the Court rules the material is not confidential. 13 10. All provisions of this Order restricting the communication or use of Confidential 14 Information shall continue to be binding after the conclusion of this action, unless otherwise 15 agreed or ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lester James as Grandparent and Legal Guardian of K.J., a Minor Child v. Lyon County; a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; Lyon County Sheriff Deputy Doe 1 Taylor Cunningham; State of Nevada on relation of the Department of Public Safety, Highway Patrol Division; Nevada State Police Highway Patrol Officer Doe 2; Nevada State Police Highway Patrol Officer Doe 3; and Does 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lester-james-as-grandparent-and-legal-guardian-of-kj-a-minor-child-v-nvd-2025.