Lester Jack Bowen v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 21, 2018·No. 01-18-00612-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-18-00612-CR Style: Lester Jack Bowen v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: August 16, 2018 Type of motion: Motion to Substitute Counsel Party filing motion: Appellant’s Retained Counsel Nick G. Davis Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No.

Ordered that motion is:  Granted  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellant’s retained counsel’s motion to substitute counsel is granted because it was signed by both new and withdrawing counsel and appellant and complies with Rule 6.5(d). See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.3(c), 6.5(b), (d). Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to remove Dustin Nimz as attorney for appellant and to add Nick G. Davis as lead counsel for appellant.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: August 21, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lester Jack Bowen v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Lester Jack Bowen v. State (Lester Jack Bowen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.