Lesser v. Fuechsl

2 Balt. C. Rep. 355
CourtBaltimore City Superior Court
DecidedJune 30, 1905
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Balt. C. Rep. 355 (Lesser v. Fuechsl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Baltimore City Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lesser v. Fuechsl, 2 Balt. C. Rep. 355 (Md. Super. Ct. 1905).

Opinion

BAER, J.-

The demurrer to the declaration in this case must be sustained upon the authority of Bartlett vs. Christhilf, 69 Md., 219-231.

It is admitted that the case as set forth in the declaration, is one for the malicious abuse of the process of the court. There is no allegation of the arrest of the person of the plaintiff or the seizure of her property, and the [356]*356Court of Appeals in the case referred to expressly says that “all the cases upon this subject” depend upon one or the other of these two things.

Demurrer sustained with leave to the plaintiff to file an amended declaration within fifteen days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bartlett v. Christhilf
14 A. 518 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Balt. C. Rep. 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lesser-v-fuechsl-mdsuperctbalt-1905.