Lesser v. Dry Dock, East Broadway & Battery Railroad
This text of 33 Misc. 388 (Lesser v. Dry Dock, East Broadway & Battery Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff, having complied with the only condition prescribed by the statute, is entitled to a preference as a matter of right, and delay after issue joined, in placing the case on the calendar, cannot defeat this right. Section 791, subdivision 5, of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that an "action is entitled to a preference, in which an infant is the sole plaintiff. The pleadings show that this is such a cause. The record shows, and it is not disputed, that the notice of motion for a preference was served with the notice of trial, as required by section 793 of the said Code. The claim of preference thus perfected thereupon became an absolute right. Roads v. Metropolitan St. R. Co., 50 App. Div. 160; Levy v. Hanneman, 47 id. 32.
Order appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs.
Present: McCarthy, O’Dwyee and Sohuchman, JJ.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 Misc. 388, 67 N.Y.S. 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lesser-v-dry-dock-east-broadway-battery-railroad-nynyccityct-1900.