Lessee of Willis v. Row

3 Yeates 520
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 15, 1803·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Sed per cur.

The words of the act are, “every trustee be“fore he acts as such shall give bond,” &c. The insolvent debtor is devested of all his property at the moment of the assignment, though the trustees cannot act until they have executed bonds, under the strict words of the law. We have found it impossible to carry this law into effect in this particular ; and during its continuance we are persuaded, that far the greater number of trustees appointed by the Supreme Court have not given bonds. Few persons will devote their time to the service of others, and give security for that purpose, in cases where the prospect of obtaining payment of their debts is very small and remote. But it would be monstrous to suppose, that an insolvent debtor, after assigning his estate, and his person is freed from arrests, could maintain an ejectment for lands vested in him previous to his discharge, his debts remaining unpaid. If this could be tolerated, because the trustees had not given bond, he might sell his lands the moment after his discharge, and bid defiance to his creditors.

Plaintiff nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lessee of Willis v. Row, 3 Yeates 520 (Pa. 1803).

3 Yeates 520 (Lessee of Willis v. Row) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power v. Hollman
2 Watts 218 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1834)
Wickersham v. Nicholson
14 Serg. & Rawle 118 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1826)