Lessee of Penn v. Messinger

1 Yeates 2
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 15, 1791·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

These ejectments had been removed by the plaintiffs from the Common Pleas of Northampton county, and writs of estrepement had been issued in pursuance of rules in that court, and served on the parties. Mr. Sitgreaves for the plaintiffs moved for a rule on the defendants, to shew cause why attachments should not issue against them, for a contempt in disobeying the process of the inferior court, the whole record being removed by certiorari. But the court refused to grant the rule. They said they knew of no case where one court punished a contempt offered to another court, and would not carry the system of punishing by attachments further than they were clearly warranted by practice and adjudged cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lessee of Penn v. Messinger, 1 Yeates 2 (Pa. 1791).

1 Yeates 2 (Lessee of Penn v. Messinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seidman's Estate
113 A. 671 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
Commonwealth v. Shecter
95 A. 468 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1915)
Kirk v. Milwaukee Dust Collector Manuf'g Co.
26 F. 501 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin, 1885)
In re Litchfield
13 F. 863 (E.D. Michigan, 1882)
Phillips v. Welch
12 Nev. 158 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1877)