Lessee of Meredith v. Macoss

1 Yeates 200
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 15, 1793
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 1 Yeates 200 (Lessee of Meredith v. Macoss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lessee of Meredith v. Macoss, 1 Yeates 200 (Pa. 1793).

Opinion

per Cur.

But This is a still stronger deviation from the rules of evidence than what was first attempted. To deduce an argument from a person’s usurpation of property, or their possessing themselves of lands, that they therein acted under the authority of the owner, is unfair reasoning, and might be advan*ced to sanctify any trespass whatever. Such r*noi testimony would be attended with dangerous conse- L quences, and prove highly injurious to society. We cannot possibly receive it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parrish v. Koons
1 Parsons 78 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1844)
Grayson v. Bannon
8 Watts 524 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1839)
Blood v. Goodrich
9 Wend. 68 (New York Supreme Court, 1832)
Cortes v. Billings
1 Johns. Cas. 270 (New York Supreme Court, 1800)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Yeates 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lessee-of-meredith-v-macoss-pa-1793.