Lessee of Hatch v. Barr

Ohio Supreme Court

Lessee of Hatch v. Barr

1 Ohio 390

DecidedDecember 15, 1824

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ohio 390 (Lessee of Hatch v. Barr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lessee of Hatch v. Barr, 1 Ohio 390 (Ohio 1824).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court :

The paper offered in evidence purports to be a conveyance from the president and directors of the Miami Exporting Company as grantors. It is executed by O. M. Spencer as president, in his own name and under his own seal as president. The grantors named in the deed do not execute it. The person who executed it had no interest in the subject conveyed, and is not named as grantor in the deed. It is, therefore, no conveyance. The motion for a new trial is overruled, and judgment entered on the verdict.

Judge Burnet, being a stockholder in the Miami Exporting Company, did not sit in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court :

The paper offered in evidence purports to be a conveyance from the president and directors of the Miami Exporting Company as grantors. It is executed by O. M. Spencer as president, in his own name and under his own seal as president. The grantors named in the deed do not execute it. The person who executed it had no interest in the subject conveyed, and is not named as grantor in the deed. It is, therefore, no conveyance. The motion for a new trial is overruled, and judgment entered on the verdict.

Judge Burnet, being a stockholder in the Miami Exporting Company, did not sit in this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Ohio 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lessee-of-hatch-v-barr-ohio-1824.