Lessee of Galbreath v. Eichelberger

3 Yeates 515
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 15, 1803·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

The court were divided in opinion, whether the witness was receivable on the ground of interest. Yeates, J. declared himself in the affirmative, and Smith, J. in the negative. But they readily agreed that he was privileged from giving evidence, under the maxim cited. They could not avoid seeing the tendency of his examination, disguise it as you will. The plaintiffs’ strong hold was, that the deeds were executed to protect the property against the judgment, which was to ensue in six months, and that the father and sons combined together to defraud the creditors of the former, and to create a trust for his use. If it should even be conceded, that an indictment would not lie against the witness for agreeing to accept this deed, which though void against creditors, might be good against the grantor and his heirs, yet the combination itself was nefarious and immoral, and would justly subject every person concerned in it to ignominy and contempt, and was therefore within the construction of the maxim, as lately adopted in Respub. v. Gibbs, [517] in bank. The rules of evidence

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lessee of Galbreath v. Eichelberger, 3 Yeates 515 (Pa. 1803).

3 Yeates 515 (Lessee of Galbreath v. Eichelberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Taylor, N.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2024
Commonwealth v. Taylor, N., Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2020
Com. v. Gilbert, T.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2015
Commonwealth v. Hayes
674 A.2d 677 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1996)
Commonwealth v. Swinehart
664 A.2d 957 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
D'Elia v. Pennsylvania Crime Commission
555 A.2d 864 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)
Rich Hill Coal Company v. Bashore
7 A.2d 302 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Commonwealth v. Duca
165 A. 825 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Brown v. Walker
161 U.S. 591 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Counselman v. Hitchcock
142 U.S. 547 (Supreme Court, 1892)
Horstman v. Kaufman
97 Pa. 147 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1881)
United States v. White
28 F. Cas. 572 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1838)
Mullen v. M'Kelvy
5 Watts 399 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1836)