Lessee of Frost v. Frostburg Coal Co.

65 U.S. 278, 16 L. Ed. 637, 24 How. 278, 1860 U.S. LEXIS 399
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 21, 1861
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 65 U.S. 278 (Lessee of Frost v. Frostburg Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lessee of Frost v. Frostburg Coal Co., 65 U.S. 278, 16 L. Ed. 637, 24 How. 278, 1860 U.S. LEXIS 399 (1861).

Opinion

Mr. Justice NELSON

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error to .the Circuit Court of the United . States for the district of Maryland.

*279 The action in the court'below was an ejectment brought by ■the heirs of Isaiah Frost, to recover the possession of a tract of land, situate in the county of Allegany,.Maryland.• The defence set up was a-conveyance of the land by their ancestor ■ to the defendants. The.only question in the case is,-whether or not the Frostburg Coal Company was capable of taking and holding real estate at the date of the.deed, the 13th March, 1845. '

The court charged the jury, if they found that Mechack Frost,-Isaiah Frost, Thomas J. McKaig, and William W. Mc-Kaig, the parties named in-the act of incorporation of 1845, accepted the charter, and proceeded to act’ as- á corporate body under it, by the name of the Frostburg Coal Company, opened their coal mines, transported the. coal to' market, borrowed money on the credit of -the company, and made large and costly improvements ■ on .the lands in controversy, during all- which time Isaiah Frost, the .ancestor, acted as one of the directors; and further found, that the said Frost executed and delivered to the company the deed of the 13th March,; 1845, given in evidence, they must find a verdict for the défendants:-

The act of incorporation, which was passed February 24, 1845, provided that Mechack Frost, Isaiah Frost, Thomas J, McKaig, and William W. McKaig, and siich other persons as may be associated with -them in the manner afterwards provided, shall 'be and they are hereby incorporated and made a body politic and corporate, by the name of the Fr'osiburg Coal Gompany, and' by that name shall have succession, &e., conferring the usual, corporate powers for the manufacture of iron, and mining of coal, and for transporting the same to market; and among others, the power to purchase and hold all such property, real, personal, and mixed, as the company may require for the.purposes aforesaid.

The second section provided, that the capital -stock of' thé -company' should consist of five thousand shares of one hundred dollars each, of which the lands and mines of Mécliack Frost, Isaiah Frost, Thomas J. McKaig, and William W. McKaig, on one part, and those who may associate with them *280 and constitute the aforesaid subscription for stock; payable in money, on the other part.

The third, section provided, that the subscriptions to the capital stock should be made at such places, and in such manner, as should be designated by the four persons above named, and that the shareholders of one or more shares of stock should be members of the corporation, and entitled to one vote for ea’h share so held; and making the shares assignable and transferable, as may be provided in the by-laws of the com-, pany. . .

The fourth section provided, that the affairs of the company should be managed by a president and four directors, to be chosen jby the stockholders, to serve one year, and till others shall be elected; and until the first election of directors shall be held, the said Mechack Frost, Isaiah Frost, Thomas J. McKaig, and William W. McKaig, shall have full power and authority to exercise all the corporate powers of the said company, fc. .

The fifth section provided, that a general meeting of the stockholders should be held as soon as the company is organized, and annually thereafter, on the first Monday of June in each year, for the election of directors, and to consult upon the business of the company.

On the 12th March, 1845, the associates met in pursuance of the authority given in the third section of the act, at which meeting the whole number of shares, constituting the capita! stock, were subscribed, and the company proceeded to the election of the president and four directors, the number required by the' charter for the ensuing year; and at the same .time, directed that the secretary should procure dgeds to the company for the lands,- which should constitute par! of the capital stock. And on the 21st of the month; the board met, and provided for* the issuing of certificates of the .capital stock . to each stockholder.

It was in pursuance of the resolution of the 12th March, that the deed of Isaiah Frost, the ancestor of the lessors of the plaintiff, was executed. This deed contained some four hundred and sixty-four acres of land, which, together with several parcels conveyed by Mechack Frost, another of the stockhold *281 era, dated on the same-day, and adjoining the former, tract, embraced the coal mines of the company,4for the working of which it was incorporated.

The company immediately commenced preparations for opening the mines, and for transporting the coal to market, by constructing rail arid tram roads leading into the mines, erecting buildings for the accommodation of the workmen, together with other necessary improvements, at an expense of some fifteen thousand dollars; also, a large amount of coal had been taken out of the mines-, and sent to the market; all of which was done during the lifetime of Isaiah Frost, and while he was one of the most active and efficient 'directors, and all or nearly all of said fixtures and improvements had been made upon the parcel of land in question, and for which he had received stock. He vvas the largest stockholder but one in the company, and had dealt in the stock, by pledging it for money borrowed.

As we have already said, the main ground relied upon, on behalf of the heirs, to avoid the deed to the defendants, is the failure to organize under the charter, so as to constitute them a corporation capable of taking and holding real estate. It is supposed that there are some, conditions precedent to the existence of the corporation which have not been performed, and that the act, of its own force, did not constitute them a corporate body. But a slight reference to the charter will show that the position is a mistaken one. The first section declares, that the four persons, and such others as maybe associated with them, shall be and are hereby incorporated and •made a body politic and corporate, by the name of the Fróstburg Coal Company; and then confers upon it the usual powers belonging to a corporation, and among others, to purchase and hold real estate for the purposes'of the company; and in the fourth section declares, that until the first election of directors shall be held, the four persons.named shall have full power and authority to exercise all the .corporate powers of the company. The charter took effect immediately on its acceptance by the persons named, and the subsequent steps,, such as the subscription of the stock, procurement of the coal *282 lands,.election of the directors, of the president and secretary, passing by-laws, &c., were steps tajeen in.perfecting the organization, and enabling it to use the powers and privileges con-, ferred for.the purposes for which they were granted. . .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freestate Land Corp. v. Bostetter
440 A.2d 380 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1982)
Held v. Crosthwaite
260 F. 613 (Second Circuit, 1919)
Keystone Wood Co. v. Susquehanna Boom Co.
235 F. 800 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1916)
Kardo Co. v. Adams
231 F. 950 (Sixth Circuit, 1916)
Cluthe v. Evansville, Mt. Carmel & Northern Railway Co.
95 N.E. 543 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1911)
Murphy v. Wheatley
63 A. 62 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1906)
Postal Tel. Cable Co. of Utah v. Oregon S. L. R.
65 P. 735 (Utah Supreme Court, 1901)
Coalter v. Bargamin
37 S.E. 779 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1901)
Andrews v. National Foundry & Pipe Works, Ltd.
77 F. 774 (Seventh Circuit, 1897)
Santa Rosa City R. Co. v. Central St. Ry. Co.
38 P. 986 (California Supreme Court, 1895)
Union Water Co. v. Kean
52 N.J. Eq. 111 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1893)
Southern Pacific Co. v. United States
28 Ct. Cl. 77 (Court of Claims, 1893)
McGinty v. Athol Reservoir Co.
29 N.E. 510 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1892)
Elizabethtown Gas Light Co. v. Green
46 N.J. Eq. 118 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1889)
People ex rel. Hunt v. National Savings Bank
22 N.E. 288 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1889)
Humphreys v. Mooney
5 Colo. 282 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1880)
Hammond v. Straus
53 Md. 1 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1880)
Merchants & Manufacturers' Bank v. Stone
38 Mich. 779 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1878)
New Central Coal Co. v. George's Creek Coal & Iron Co.
37 Md. 537 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1873)
Franklin Fire Insurance v. Hart
31 Md. 59 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1869)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 U.S. 278, 16 L. Ed. 637, 24 How. 278, 1860 U.S. LEXIS 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lessee-of-frost-v-frostburg-coal-co-scotus-1861.