Lessee of Church v. Church
4 Yeates 279
Opinion
I fully agree with Mr. Justice Bradford in his observation on that case, and that it varied from the law in England. 2 Dali. 172.
The court unanimously think this evidence cannot be received ; it directly militates against the act of frauds and perjuries. The greatest dangers would ensue. Here there is no resulting trust. The deed would enure as a voluntary deed, unless creditors were thereby defrauded. Neither on principle nor precedent can the testimony be admitted.
The jury gave a verdict for the plaintiff without leaving the bar.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lessee of Church v. Church, 4 Yeates 279 (Pa. 1806).
4 Yeates 279 (Lessee of Church v. Church) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jaques v. Weeks
7 Watts 261 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1838)
Burke ex rel. Harrison v. Allen
3 Yeates 351 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1802)
Leving v. Will
1 U.S. 430 (Supreme Court, 1789)