Lessee of Black v. Hepburne

2 Yeates 331
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 15, 1798·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the court.

The boundaries of all actions ought to be preserved. 8 Mod. 275. On the present motion, where our opinions on a mere law point are with the defendant, we cannot permit the cause to go on, without declaring them, and reserve the point. If it should tarn out that we are mistaken, the court will award a new trial without costs.

Incorporeal things are in their nature invisible, quoe ñeque tangi. nee videri possunt, and therefore are not in their nature capable of being delivered in execution. The general rule is, as has been stated by the defendant, that ejectment will only lie for things whereof possession may be delivered by the sheriff. The case of common append-ant or appurtenant is in some degree an exception ; but there the officer by giving posession of the land gives possession of the common. 1 Stra. 54. The plaintiff has shown no title to the soil of the intermediate ground in dispute wdiatever privilege ho, or the other townsmen, may have to the landing place. Ejectment

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lessee of Black v. Hepburne, 2 Yeates 331 (Pa. 1798).

2 Yeates 331 (Lessee of Black v. Hepburne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Borough of Summerhill v. Sherbine
88 Pa. Super. 419 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)
Snowden v. Loree
122 F. 493 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania, 1902)
Paul v. Carver
26 Pa. 223 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1856)
Union Canal Co. v. Young
1 Whart. 410 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1836)
Le Fevre v. Le Fevre
4 Serg. & Rawle 241 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1818)