Lessard v. City of Allen Park

422 F. Supp. 2d 787, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57409, 2006 WL 778611
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan
DecidedMarch 10, 2006
DocketCIV 00-74306
StatusPublished

This text of 422 F. Supp. 2d 787 (Lessard v. City of Allen Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lessard v. City of Allen Park, 422 F. Supp. 2d 787, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57409, 2006 WL 778611 (E.D. Mich. 2006).

Opinion

OPINION AND ORDER

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF SPECIAL MASTER AND AUTHORIZING DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS TO CLAIMANTS, ATTORNEYS, AND DEPOSITORY BANK

FEIKENS, District Judge.

I have reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Special Master Ronald Longhofer Regarding Proposed Distribution List and Final Attorney Fee, submitted pursuant to the Order Appointing Special Master and Establishing Procedures for Administration of Settlement, and the Order Granting Motion of Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel for Costs and Attorney Fees. No objections to the Special Master’s Report and Recommendation have been filed.

The Report and Recommendation shows both care and thoroughness on behalf of the Special Master. I hereby adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Therefore, I authorize (1) that distribution be made to the claimants in accordance with the Special Master’s recommendations; (2) that the final payment be made to Plaintiffs’ attorneys in accordance with the Special Master’s recommendation; and (3) the fees of Comerica Bank be automatically debited in accordance with the Special Master’s recommendation.

I await the Special Master’s verification that these payments have been made and his request for the final payments to himself and the Garden City Group, Inc.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF SPECIAL MASTER REGARDING PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION LIST AND FINAL ATTORNEY FEE

RONALD S. LONGHOFER, Special Master.

This report and recommendation is made pursuant to the Order Appointing Special Master and Establishing Procedures for Administration of Settlement, dated February 23, 2005 (the Administration Order). For the reasons discussed below, the Special Master recommends that the Court now approve the final distribution 1 to the class of the amount re *789 maining in the settlement fund after the payment of the remaining attorney fees and expenses of administration.

BACKGROUND

These consolidated class actions arose out of basement flooding that occurred during the period September 10-12, 2000. A settlement was reached among the parties, and documented in the Class Action Settlement and Release Agreement (Settlement Agreement), filed herein on February 25, 2005. The settlement was approved at a hearing held on April 5, 2005. See Order Approving Class Action Settlement and Awarding Attorney Fee, dated April 5, 2005, and Opinion and Order, dated June 6, 2005. The settlement created a common fund in the amount of $12,750,000 for the benefit of the class (the Initial Class Settlement Fund).

The Court’s Order Granting Motion of Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel for Costs and Attorney Fees, dated April 5, 2005 (Costs and Fees Order), awarded Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel an attorney fee of one third of the difference between the Initial Class Settlement Fund and the costs awarded by the Court after the Special Master’s audit of the claim for costs submitted by Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel. The Special Master audited the claim for costs and filed a Report and Recommendation on July 14, 2005, recommending an award of costs in the amount of $335,478.25 (the Initial Costs Award), of which $292,428.25 would be paid to Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel directly, and the balance of $43,050.00 would be paid directly to Stonier Consulting Services, one of Plaintiffs’ experts. Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel did not object to this award, and the Court entered an Order Adopting Report and Recommendation of Special Master and Authorizing Payment for Attorneys’ Costs, dated July 18, 2005, authorizing payments in the recommended amounts from the settlement fund. These costs were paid from the settlement fund on August 2, 2005.

On September 27, 2005, Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel filed their Motion for Payment of Attorney Fees and Additional Costs, which the Court referred to the Special Master for a report and recommendation. In the Report and Recommendation of Special Master Regarding Motion for Payment of Attorney Fees and Additional Costs, dated November 18, 2005, the Special Master recommended that Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel be paid the amounts of $19,956.81 in additional costs incurred during settlement administration (the Additional Costs Award), and $3,000,000 as a progress payment toward the total attorney fee, noting that “[t]he balance of the attorney fee will be the total fee calculated as provided in the Costs and Fees Order (after accounting for all expense reimbursements to Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel), less the $3,000,000 progress payment.” The Court approved these payments in its Order of November 28, 2005, directing that the funds be paid to the firm of Macuga & Liddle, for distribution to counsel for Plaintiffs in accordance with paragraph 27 of the Settlement Agreement. The Order further provided: “When the Special Master and Class Counsel have completed their duties, the final attorney fee will be calculable, and a motion for the remainder of the fees and costs can be made at that time.” The additional costs and attorney fee progress payment were disbursed from the settlement fund as directed by. the Court.

THE PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION LIST

Under the Administration Order, class members who wished to participate in the settlement were required to submit timely damage estimate forms to Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel. Administration Order, para *790 graph 3(a). Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel were then required to maintain custody of the claim forms and supporting documentation, tabulate pertinent information in spreadsheet format, determine tentative approved claim amounts (subdivided into business loss, out-of-pocket expenses, personal property damage, and/or real property damage), and submit the spreadsheet to the Special Master within 90 days after the deadline for submitting claims. Administration Order, paragraphs 3(b)-(d). Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel received a total of 3,195 separate claims 2 from class members, and performed the above duties in a timely manner.

Upon receipt of the spreadsheet containing the tentative approved claim amounts from Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel, the Special Master audited the claims, and the underlying documentation, on a sampling basis, and created a list of approved claim amounts as required by paragraph 3(d) of the Administration Order. The Special Master provided the list of approved claim amounts to Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel, who mailed, on or about October 30, 2005, notices of the approved claim amounts to all claimants whose approved amounts were less than the amount claimed on their damage estimate forms. The claimants receiving such notices had 30 days to submit objections to their approved claim amounts; if no timely objections were filed, the approved claim amounts were deemed final. Administration Order, paragraph 3(e).

Objections were received from 28 claimants. The claim forms and underlying documentation received from the objecting claimants were thoroughly reviewed by the Special Master.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
422 F. Supp. 2d 787, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57409, 2006 WL 778611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lessard-v-city-of-allen-park-mied-2006.