Lesnik v. NAT'L CARLOADING CORP.
132 N.E.2d 326, 309 N.Y. 958
This text of 132 N.E.2d 326 (Lesnik v. NAT'L CARLOADING CORP.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lesnik v. NAT'L CARLOADING CORP., 132 N.E.2d 326, 309 N.Y. 958 (N.Y. 1956).
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of Morris L. Lesnik, Appellant,
v.
National Carloading Corporation et al., Respondents. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Peter Keber for appellant.
Morgan F. Bisselle and Warren C. Tucker for National Carloading Corporation and another, respondents.
Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ. Taking no part: DYE, J.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Claim of Lesnik v. National Carloading Corp.
132 N.E.2d 326 (New York Court of Appeals, 1956)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
132 N.E.2d 326, 309 N.Y. 958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lesnik-v-natl-carloading-corp-ny-1956.