Leslie William Reamer v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Leslie William Reamer v. United States

228 F.2d 906

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 13, 1955

Docket12686_1

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 228 F.2d 906 (Leslie William Reamer v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leslie William Reamer v. United States, 228 F.2d 906 (6th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is taken from the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion to vacate sentence filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. Appellant’s motion was based upon the claim that the evidence upon which he was convicted was inconsistent with the indictment. The indictment charged that appellant, in the course of a bank robbery, “did put in jeopardy the life of Fred W. Pluskat, by the use of a dangerous weapon, * * The evidence showed that it was actually appellant’s co-defendant who held Pluskat at gun point.

Assuming that this claim was of a kind that could properly be made in a motion to vacate sentence, it was without merit. As the district court pointed out, a complete answer to the appellant’s contention is the law that makes a principal of an aider and abettor. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is taken from the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion to vacate sentence filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. Appellant’s motion was based upon the claim that the evidence upon which he was convicted was inconsistent with the indictment. The indictment charged that appellant, in the course of a bank robbery, “did put in jeopardy the life of Fred W. Pluskat, by the use of a dangerous weapon, * * The evidence showed that it was actually appellant’s co-defendant who held Pluskat at gun point.

Assuming that this claim was of a kind that could properly be made in a motion to vacate sentence, it was without merit. As the district court pointed out, a complete answer to the appellant’s contention is the law that makes a principal of an aider and abettor. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 F.2d 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leslie-william-reamer-v-united-states-ca6-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack