Leslie v. Leslie

239 S.W. 633, 1922 Tex. App. LEXIS 578
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 9, 1922
DocketNo. 1337.
StatusPublished

This text of 239 S.W. 633 (Leslie v. Leslie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leslie v. Leslie, 239 S.W. 633, 1922 Tex. App. LEXIS 578 (Tex. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

HIGGINS, J.

The appeal in this case was attempted to be perfected by an affidavit under article 2098, R. S. The affidavit was made before a notary public some days subsequent to the adjournment of the tdrm. Proof thus made is insufficient. The statute requires that it be made before the court trying the case or the county judge. There is nothing to show that the affidavit was presented to, or in any wise acted upon, by such court, or the county judge. Por the reason indicated this court is without jurisdiction, and the appeal must be dismissed. Graves v. Horn, 89 Tex. 77, 33 S. W. 322; Bargna v. Bargna (Tex. Civ. App.) 123 S. W. 1143; Smith v. Lumber Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 129 S. W. 1145.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Graves v. Horn
33 S.W. 322 (Texas Supreme Court, 1895)
Godfrey v. Lackey
129 S.W. 1145 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 S.W. 633, 1922 Tex. App. LEXIS 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leslie-v-leslie-texapp-1922.