Leslie v. General Motors LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided April 9, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-00915·Unknown

Opinion

g EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TRICIA RAYLENE LESLIE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00915-JLT-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT ll TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST DOCKET V. TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL GENERAL MOTORS LLC, (ECF No. 18) Defendant. On April 8, 2025, the parties filed what is stylized on the docket as a motion to dismiss; however, in reality, it is a stipulation dismissing this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 18.) In light of the stipulation, this entire action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)GD; Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed pursuant to the terms of the stipulation. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41 (a). IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. Dated: _ April 8, 2025 ; STANLEY A. BOONE United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leslie v. General Motors LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Leslie v. General Motors LLC (Leslie v. General Motors LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)