Leslie v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided January 5, 2024·No. 1:22-cv-02305·Unknown

Opinion

Klay | Nas 0)

THE City OF NEW YORK HON. SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX LAW DEPARTMENT Marilyn Richter Corporation Counsel 100 CHURCH STREET PONS NEW YORK, NY 10007 . (212) 356-2083 mrichter@law.nyc.gov

January 4, 2023

The Honorable Naomi R. Buchwald United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, N.Y. 10007 Re: Leslie v. City of New York 22 cv 02305

Your Honor: Defendants are submitting herewith, a proposed court order that would provide authorization for employees of the New York City Police Department, the New York City Law Department and the New York City Office of the Chief Medical Examiner to access records that are sealed pursuant to state law (New York Criminal Procedure Law § 160.50) for the purpose of obtaining information that Plaintiff has requested in discovery. The information will be provided to Plaintiff’s counsel without identifymg information as to individuals. Plaintiffs counsel has reviewed this proposed order, has made proposed edits, which have been accepted, and has authorized me to inform Your Honor that they do not object to this proposed order. Thank you for this consideration. Respectfully, /s/ Marilyn Richter Marilyn Richter Assistant Corporation Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK +--+ ee ee ee + x SHAKIRA LESLIE; on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, PROPOSED COURT ORDER Plaintiff, 22-CV-02305 -against- CITY OF NEW YORK; EDWARD CABAN, Police Commissioner for the City of New York, in his official capacity; JEFFREY MADDREY, Chief of Department for the New York City Police Department, in his official capacity; JAMES ESSIG, Chief of Detectives for the New York City Police Department, in his official capacity; BRIAN MCGEE, Deputy Chief in the Forensic Investigations Division of the New York City Police Department, in his official capacity; and DR. JASON GRAHAM, Chief Medical Examiner for the City of New York, in his official capacity, Defendants.

□□ ee X WHEREAS, pursuant to New York Criminal Procedure Law § 160.50(1)(c), upon termination of a criminal action or proceeding in favor of the accused, “...all official records and papers...relating to the arrest or prosecution...shall be sealed and will not made available to any person or public or private agency;” and; WHEREAS, New York Criminal Procedure Law § 160.50 is not binding upon the federal courts, see, e.g., Woodard v. City of New York, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5231 at * 8-9, No. 99 CV 1123 LG) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 10, 2000), and; WHEREAS, as part of the discovery in this case, Defendants have agreed to produce data and mformation regarding their practices that can only be obtamed from access to sealed records and; WHEREAS, the data and information that will be produced to Plaintiff will not identify the individuals whose records have been sealed; THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered that employees of the New York City Police Department, the New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner, and the New York City Law Department may access sealed records solely for the purpose of obtaining and producing non- identifiable data and information in discovery. ett of sass January 5, 2024 ( La oe ee bhewp becraatdd Date NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leslie v. City of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Leslie v. City of New York (Leslie v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 160.50
New York § 160.50(1)(c)
§ 160.50
New York CPL § 160.50