Leslie H. Harry v. Edgar C. Newell

237 F.2d 229
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 2, 1956·No. 15240_1·Published

Opinion

237 F.2d 229

Leslie H. HARRY, Appellant,
v.
Edgar C. NEWELL, Appellee.

Nos. 15239, 15240.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 2, 1956.

Vergeer & Samuels, Duane Vergeer, Portland, Or., for appellant.

Sabin & Malarkey, Verne W. Newcomb, Portland, Or., for appellee.

Before STEPHENS, CHAMBERS, and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of appellee to dismiss appeals is granted upon the ground that an appeal from an order granting a new trial is not appealable. See Bateman v. Donovan, 9 Cir., 1942, 131 F.2d 759; United States v. Hayes, 9 Cir., 172 F.2d 677, 679.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leslie H. Harry v. Edgar C. Newell, 237 F.2d 229 (9th Cir. 1956).

237 F.2d 229 (Leslie H. Harry v. Edgar C. Newell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bateman v. Donovan
131 F.2d 759 (Ninth Circuit, 1942)
United States v. Hayes
172 F.2d 677 (Ninth Circuit, 1949)