Leslie H. Harry v. Edgar C. Newell
Opinion
237 F.2d 229
Leslie H. HARRY, Appellant,
v.
Edgar C. NEWELL, Appellee.
Nos. 15239, 15240.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 2, 1956.
Vergeer & Samuels, Duane Vergeer, Portland, Or., for appellant.
Sabin & Malarkey, Verne W. Newcomb, Portland, Or., for appellee.
Before STEPHENS, CHAMBERS, and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The motion of appellee to dismiss appeals is granted upon the ground that an appeal from an order granting a new trial is not appealable. See Bateman v. Donovan, 9 Cir., 1942, 131 F.2d 759; United States v. Hayes, 9 Cir., 172 F.2d 677, 679.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
237 F.2d 229 (Leslie H. Harry v. Edgar C. Newell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.