Leslie H. Harry v. Edgar C. Newell
This text of 237 F.2d 229 (Leslie H. Harry v. Edgar C. Newell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
237 F.2d 229
Leslie H. HARRY, Appellant,
v.
Edgar C. NEWELL, Appellee.
Nos. 15239, 15240.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 2, 1956.
Vergeer & Samuels, Duane Vergeer, Portland, Or., for appellant.
Sabin & Malarkey, Verne W. Newcomb, Portland, Or., for appellee.
Before STEPHENS, CHAMBERS, and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The motion of appellee to dismiss appeals is granted upon the ground that an appeal from an order granting a new trial is not appealable. See Bateman v. Donovan, 9 Cir., 1942, 131 F.2d 759; United States v. Hayes, 9 Cir., 172 F.2d 677, 679.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
237 F.2d 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leslie-h-harry-v-edgar-c-newell-ca9-1956.