Leskiw v. Breihan

297 S.W.3d 603, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1322, 2009 WL 3050912
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 22, 2009·No. ED 92503·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mary Lisa Leskiw (“Leskiw”) appeals from a Judgment and Order dismissing with prejudice her Motion to Determine Amounts Due and Owing. On appeal, she argues that the trial court erred in sustaining Mark Allen Breihan’s (“Breihan”) Motion to Dismiss Petition (Motion to Dismiss) because the doctrine of res judicata is not applicable and therefore the trial court lacked a basis for sustaining the Motion to Dismiss. We find no error and affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leskiw v. Breihan, 297 S.W.3d 603, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1322, 2009 WL 3050912 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

297 S.W.3d 603 (Leskiw v. Breihan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.