Lesieur v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lesieur v. State

444 S.W.3d 483, 2014 WL 3579560, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 790

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 22, 2014·No. No. WD 76307·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Carl Lesieur appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Lesieur was convicted by a Boone County jury of two counts of second-degree statutory rape and sentenced to seven years on each count, to run consecutively to each other and to other sentences Lesieur was serving. We affirmed his direct appeal. Lesieur now alleges that he received ineffective assistance of counsel regarding the cross examination of two witnesses at trial. We affirm. A memorandum explaining our [484] decision has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Carl Lesieur appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Lesieur was convicted by a Boone County jury of two counts of second-degree statutory rape and sentenced to seven years on each count, to run consecutively to each other and to other sentences Lesieur was serving. We affirmed his direct appeal. Lesieur now alleges that he received ineffective assistance of counsel regarding the cross examination of two witnesses at trial. We affirm. A memorandum explaining our [484] decision has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Lesieur v. State, 444 S.W.3d 483, 2014 WL 3579560, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 790 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

444 S.W.3d 483 (Lesieur v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.