Lesher v. Gehr

1 U.S. 330, 1 Dall. 330
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 15, 1788
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 U.S. 330 (Lesher v. Gehr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lesher v. Gehr, 1 U.S. 330, 1 Dall. 330 (1788).

Opinion

By the Court:

The Legislature before the Revolution prescribed no rules for the Supreme Court; but it is certainly vested with the powers of the King’s Bench and Common Pleas in England; and the practice has been, in general, governed by the same law. Hence, we find, that it was formerly thought necessary to proceed by Testatum in Pennsylvania; and although a contrary practice has lately obtained, it is without the opinion or sanction of the court.

We think, therefore, that this execution must be quashed; and in every future case of the same kind, let a Fi. fa. be filed in the Supreme Court, with a return of nulla bona; and then a term must intervene before the Testatum issues, in order to support the fiction.

The Execution quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ulshafer v. Stewart
71 Pa. 170 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1872)
Runkle v. Meyer
3 Yeates 518 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1803)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 U.S. 330, 1 Dall. 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lesher-v-gehr-pa-1788.