Lesher v. Beesmeire

14 N.W. 461, 30 Minn. 106, 1882 Minn. LEXIS 37
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 20, 1882·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bbuey, J.*

The appellant’s only point is that tbe evidence does not justify tlie verdict. The testimony is contradictory and conflicting, but that there is testimony having a reasonable tendency to support the verdict, if tbe jury believed it to be true, there can be no doubt. Tbe case is, then, one of a conflict of evidence, presenting a pure question of credibility to tbe jury. In such circumstances a settled rule of this court forbids us to disturb tbe refusal of tbe district court to grant a new trial. Sumner v. Jones, 27 Minn. 312; Wright v. Ames, 28 Minn. 362.

Judgment affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lesher v. Beesmeire, 14 N.W. 461, 30 Minn. 106, 1882 Minn. LEXIS 37 (Mich. 1882).

14 N.W. 461 (Lesher v. Beesmeire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Collerd v. Huson
34 N.J. Eq. 38 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1881)