Lesh v. Prudential Ins.

Sixth Circuit

Lesh v. Prudential Ins.

121 F.2d 446, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3232

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJune 6, 1941

DocketNo. 8659

StatusPublished

This text of 121 F.2d 446 (Lesh v. Prudential Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lesh v. Prudential Ins., 121 F.2d 446, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3232 (6th Cir. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and it appearing to the court that there was no prejudicial error, (1) in overruling appellant’s motion to remand the cause to the State court; (2) in the exclusion of testimony; (3) in the charge to the jury; (4) in the refusal to give special instructions; or (5) otherwise upon the record, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from be, and the same is in all things, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and it appearing to the court that there was no prejudicial error, (1) in overruling appellant’s motion to remand the cause to the State court; (2) in the exclusion of testimony; (3) in the charge to the jury; (4) in the refusal to give special instructions; or (5) otherwise upon the record, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from be, and the same is in all things, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 F.2d 446, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lesh-v-prudential-ins-ca6-1941.