Lesczauskis v. Downs

208 Ill. App. 257
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedNovember 30, 1917
DocketGen. No. 23,122
StatusPublished

This text of 208 Ill. App. 257 (Lesczauskis v. Downs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lesczauskis v. Downs, 208 Ill. App. 257 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Judgment, § 493*—when record of judgment against principal admissible against surety. A record of a judgment against the principal, a building contractor, is admissible in an action against the surety on the bond where there is no contention that any fraud was used in obtaining the judgment against the "principal, or that the various items or expenses which it was claimed were expended in the completion of the building, upon default of the contractor, were not correct, or that the amount of the judgment making up these items was not correct, and constituted a prima facie case. 2. Appeal and error, § 1411*—when finding of jury not disturbed. A finding of a jury based on conflicting evidence, and sustained by the trial judge, will not be disturbed on appeal. 3. Judgment, § 493*-—what does not affect admissibility of against principal in action against surety. The admissibility of a record of a judgment against the principal on a building contractor’s bond, in an action against the surety on the bond, is not affected by the fact that the first action was in assumpsit and the later action was in debt.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 Ill. App. 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lesczauskis-v-downs-illappct-1917.