Lescouzeve v. Ducatel
This text of 18 La. Ann. 470 (Lescouzeve v. Ducatel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs sued A. Ducatel, notary, and the other defendants, the securities on Ms bond as notary, to recover of them for money deposited by plaintiffs with him, A. Ducatel, to enable Mm to have erased a certain mortgage on plaintiff’s property, which he neglected to do.
The District Judge rendered judgment in favor of plaintiffs against A. Ducatel, and in favor of the other defendants against plaintiff's. Plaintiffs appealed.
The securities of a notary public are only liable on Ms failure to discharge the duties of his office.
The law has not made it the official duty of a notary to receive money to erase mortgages.
It is decreed that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed.
The costs of appeal to be paid by plaintiffs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 La. Ann. 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lescouzeve-v-ducatel-la-1866.