LESANE v. State
33 So. 3d 822, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5595, 2010 WL 1687656
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence for dealing in stolen property, but we direct the trial court to enter an order vacating appellant’s judgment of conviction and sentence for grand theft. See § 812.025, Fla. Stat.; Hall v. State, 826 So.2d 268 (Fla.2002); Pomaski v. State, 989 So.2d 721 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
LESANE v. State, 33 So. 3d 822, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5595, 2010 WL 1687656 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
33 So. 3d 822 (LESANE v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hall v. State
826 So. 2d 268 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Pomaski v. State
989 So. 2d 721 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)