Lertz v. . Hughes Brothers, Inc.

181 S.E. 336, 208 N.C. 495, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 59
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lertz v. . Hughes Brothers, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 208 N.C. 490
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 18, 1935·Published

Opinion

ScheNgk, J.

Tbis was a civil action instituted to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to bave been caused by tbe negligent operation by tbe defendant, Julia McLaurin, of an automobile in wbicb tbe plaintiff was a guest passenger.

Julia McLaurin, tbe appellee, was a codefendant witb Hughes Brothers, Incorporated, appellants in Lertz v. Hughes Brothers, Inc., et al., argued jointly witb tbis appeal in tbis Court. On tbe argument it was stated by counsel for tbe plaintiff, appellant herein, that if tbe plaintiff's judgment against Hughes Brothers, appellant in tbe other appeal, was upheld, she would be no longer interested in tbis appeal. Said judgment has been affirmed, ante, 490. ¥e bave, nevertheless, examined tbe record and think that bis Honor ruled correctly in allowing Miss Mc-Laurin’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lertz v. . Hughes Brothers, Inc., 181 S.E. 336, 208 N.C. 495, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 59 (N.C. 1935).

181 S.E. 336 (Lertz v. . Hughes Brothers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.