Leroy Williamson v. State
This text of Leroy Williamson v. State (Leroy Williamson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-09-00632-CR
Leroy Williamson, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LAMPASAS COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 8325, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING
PER CURIAM
Appellant's brief was due January 18, 2010. The brief has not been received and appellant's appointed attorney, Jeffrey D. Parker, did not respond to this Court's notice that the brief is overdue.
The appeal is abated. The trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether the attorney it appointed to represent appellant has abandoned the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). The court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations. If necessary, the court shall appoint substitute counsel who will effectively represent appellant in this cause. A record from this hearing, including copies of all findings and orders and a transcription of the court reporter's notes, shall be forwarded to the clerk of this Court for filing as a supplemental record no later than April 26, 2010. Rule 38.8(b)(3).
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop
Abated
Filed: March 12, 2010
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Leroy Williamson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leroy-williamson-v-state-texapp-2010.