Leroy v. State
205 S.W. 986, 84 Tex. Crim. 157, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 319
Opinion
This conviction was for violation of the local option law.
The court adjourned on the 37th day of- April. The statement of facts and bills of exception were not filed within the twenty days authorized by the statute. In fact, they were filed on the 3rd day of June. This was over thirty-five days after court adjourned. Therefore, neither the statement of facts nor the bills can be considered. In the absence of these there is no question presented that can be reviewed.
The judgment will be affirmed.
'Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Leroy v. State, 205 S.W. 986, 84 Tex. Crim. 157, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 319 (Tex. 1918).
205 S.W. 986 (Leroy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.