Leroy Smith v. State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 9, 2002
Docket09-01-00069-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Leroy Smith v. State of Texas (Leroy Smith v. State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leroy Smith v. State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

In The



Court of Appeals



Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont



____________________



NO. 09-01-069 CR



LEROY SMITH, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee



On Appeal from the Criminal District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 80377



OPINION

Leroy Smith entered a non-negotiated no contest plea to an indictment for the state jail felony offense of delivery of a controlled substance, cocaine, in an amount less than one gram. Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112 (Vernon Supp. 2001). The trial court convicted and sentenced Smith to two years of confinement in a state jail facility.

After appeal was perfected, appellate counsel filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). The brief concludes that the record presents no arguable error which would support an appeal, a conclusion with which we concur. On September 20, 2001, Smith was given an extension of time in which to file a pro se brief if he so desired. Smith filed a pro se brief that asks only that his concurrent sentence in another case be reduced to a state jail felony. The appeal from that conviction has been affirmed. See Smith v. State, No. 09-01-047 CR (Tex. App.--Beaumont December 5, 2001, no pet. h.)(not designated for publication).

As there was no plea bargain agreement, we have jurisdiction over the appeal. Jack v. State, 871 S.W.2d 741 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994). It appears the appellant was duly admonished. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.13 (Vernon 1989 & Supp. 2001). Smith signed a judicial confession admitting to having committed the offense. He does not contest the voluntariness of his guilty plea.

We have reviewed the clerk's and the reporter's records, and find no arguable error requiring us to order appointment of new counsel. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM



Submitted on December 31, 2001

Opinion Delivered January 9, 2002

Do Not Publish



Before Walker, C.J., Burgess and Gaultney, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Jack v. State
871 S.W.2d 741 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1994)
Stafford v. State
813 S.W.2d 503 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
High v. State
573 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Leroy Smith v. State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leroy-smith-v-state-of-texas-texapp-2002.