Leroy Hofmann v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., a Corporation

418 F.2d 919
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 20, 1969
Docket23401
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 418 F.2d 919 (Leroy Hofmann v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., a Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leroy Hofmann v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., a Corporation, 418 F.2d 919 (9th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

418 F.2d 919

LeRoy HOFMANN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
GREYHOUND LINES, INC., a corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 23401.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

November 20, 1969.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; John F. Kilkenny, Judge.

John Gordon Gearin (argued), Portland, Or., Gerald H. Robinson, Portland, Or., for appellant.

Edwin A. York (argued), of Lent, York, Paulson & Bullock, Portland, Or., Fred P. Eason, Coos Bay, Or., Gerald R. Pullen, Portland, Or., for appellee.

Before HAMLIN and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and PREGERSON, District Judge*.

PER CURIAM:

In this diversity action, the questions of Hofmann's Oregon citizenship and proximate cause of his injury were both close ones, but after careful examination of the record we are unable to say that the district court erred. We therefore affirm.

Notes:

*

Honorable Harry Pregerson, District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

George Allie Gillis v. United States
418 F.2d 919 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
418 F.2d 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leroy-hofmann-v-greyhound-lines-inc-a-corporation-ca9-1969.