Leroy Haeger v. the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co
This text of 869 F.3d 707 (Leroy Haeger v. the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Dissent by Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr.
ORDER
Defendant-Appellant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company’s unopposed motion for supplemental briefing is DENIED.
Pursuant to the opinion of the Supreme Court in Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger, — U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 1178, 197 L,Ed.2d 585 (2017), the district court’s $2.7 million sanctions award is VACATED, and, by vote of a majority of the panel judges, the matter is REMANDED to the district court for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
869 F.3d 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leroy-haeger-v-the-goodyear-tire-rubber-co-ca9-2017.