Leroy D. Dickson, Nola S. Dickson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Fourth Circuit

Leroy D. Dickson, Nola S. Dickson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

915 F.2d 1564, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 18229, 1990 WL 154492

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 17, 1990

Docket90-2032

StatusUnpublished

This text of 915 F.2d 1564 (Leroy D. Dickson, Nola S. Dickson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leroy D. Dickson, Nola S. Dickson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 915 F.2d 1564, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 18229, 1990 WL 154492 (4th Cir. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

915 F.2d 1564
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Leroy D. DICKSON, Nola S. Dickson, Petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

90-2032.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 11, 1990.
Decided Oct. 17, 1990.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. Arnold Raum, Tax Court Judge. (Tax Ct. No. 4640-84)

Leroy D. Dickson, Nola S. Dickson, petitioners pro se.

Gary R. Allen, Howard M. Soloman, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

U.S.T.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Leroy and Nola Dickson appeal the Tax Court's order upholding the Commissioner's assessment of a deficiency in their 1982 tax payment. Our review of the record and the Tax Court's opinion reveals that the Corporate Award given to Leroy Dickson by his employer, IBM, was intended as compensation and was therefore taxable under 26 U.S.C. Sec. 74(b) and 26 C.F.R. Sec. 1.74-1. Rogallo v. United States, 475 F.2d 1 (4th Cir.1973). Accordingly, we hold that this appeal is without merit, and we affirm on the reasoning of the Tax Court.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not significantly aid in the decisional process.

*

We express no opinion as to whether this Court would adopt the approach of the Ninth Circuit in Jones v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 743 F.2d 1429, 1433 (9th Cir.1984), if presented with facts similar to those in Jones

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

915 F.2d 1564
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Leroy D. DICKSON, Nola S. Dickson, Petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

90-2032.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 11, 1990.
Decided Oct. 17, 1990.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. Arnold Raum, Tax Court Judge. (Tax Ct. No. 4640-84)

Leroy D. Dickson, Nola S. Dickson, petitioners pro se.

Gary R. Allen, Howard M. Soloman, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

U.S.T.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Leroy and Nola Dickson appeal the Tax Court's order upholding the Commissioner's assessment of a deficiency in their 1982 tax payment. Our review of the record and the Tax Court's opinion reveals that the Corporate Award given to Leroy Dickson by his employer, IBM, was intended as compensation and was therefore taxable under 26 U.S.C. Sec. 74(b) and 26 C.F.R. Sec. 1.74-1. Rogallo v. United States, 475 F.2d 1 (4th Cir.1973). Accordingly, we hold that this appeal is without merit, and we affirm on the reasoning of the Tax Court.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not significantly aid in the decisional process.

*

We express no opinion as to whether this Court would adopt the approach of the Ninth Circuit in Jones v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 743 F.2d 1429, 1433 (9th Cir.1984), if presented with facts similar to those in Jones

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

915 F.2d 1564, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 18229, 1990 WL 154492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leroy-d-dickson-nola-s-dickson-v-commissioner-of-i-ca4-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack