Leroux v. Bank of America, N.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Leroux v. Bank of America, N.A.

192 So. 3d 546, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7293, 2016 WL 2759988

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 13, 2016

Docket5D15-1039

StatusPublished

This text of 192 So. 3d 546 (Leroux v. Bank of America, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leroux v. Bank of America, N.A., 192 So. 3d 546, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7293, 2016 WL 2759988 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that under the facts of this case, the trial court abused its discretion in denying the unopposed motion to vacate foreclosure sale. The record reflects that the parties had not engaged in dilatory tactics and- that granting the motion would not have unduly interfered with the efficient administration of justice. See Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Lupica, 36 So.3d 875, 876 (Fla. 6th DCA 2010).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PALMER, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that under the facts of this case, the trial court abused its discretion in denying the unopposed motion to vacate foreclosure sale. The record reflects that the parties had not engaged in dilatory tactics and- that granting the motion would not have unduly interfered with the efficient administration of justice. See Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Lupica, 36 So.3d 875, 876 (Fla. 6th DCA 2010).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PALMER, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 So. 3d 546, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7293, 2016 WL 2759988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leroux-v-bank-of-america-na-fladistctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack