Lerner v. Power
This text of 239 N.E.2d 389 (Lerner v. Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed, without costs, and the designating petition invalidated in the following memorandum: The undisputed evidence establishes as a matter of law that the questioned petitions were the product of the knowing, systematic acceptance of purported signatures of innumerable persons subscribed by others, thus constituting permeating fraudulent representation.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Korbman
Designated pursuant to section 2 of article ATI of the State Constitution in place of Burke, J., disqualified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 N.E.2d 389, 22 N.Y.2d 767, 292 N.Y.S.2d 471, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lerner-v-power-ny-1968.