Lerner v. Brin
This text of 608 So. 2d 519 (Lerner v. Brin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Hilda LERNER, Appellant,
v.
Jacob BRIN, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Whitman, Wolfe & Gross, and Irving J. Whitman, Miami, for appellant.
Michael A. Bienstock, Miami, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, a beneficiary under her mother's will, appeals a final judgment in favor *520 of appellee determining that appellant exerted undue influence on her mother. We affirm.
Appellant contends that the trial court's findings were not supported by competent and substantial evidence. Appellee asserts that the findings were supported by competent and substantial evidence.
Although one may have rachmones[1] for appellant, the trial court's findings were supported by competent and substantial evidence, and as such, will not be disturbed on appeal. See Gegen v. Learey, 503 So.2d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla. 1971).
Affirmed.
NOTES
[1] Yiddish. Rachmones: Pity, mercy, compassion. F. Kogos, Dictionary of Yiddish Slang and Idioms (Castlebooks 1967).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
608 So. 2d 519, 1992 WL 317831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lerner-v-brin-fladistctapp-1992.