Lerner, N. v. Fox, I.
This text of Lerner, N. v. Fox, I. (Lerner, N. v. Fox, I.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
NATHAN LERNER, : No. 22 EM 2022 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : HON. IDEE FOX, PRESIDENT JUDGE, : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 18th day of July, 2022, the “Complaint in the Form of Petition for
Declaratory Judgment and Writ of Prohibition or, in the Alternative, Petition for Writ of
Mandamus,” the Petition for Leave to Amend, and the Petition to Correct or Modify the
Certified Record are DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the
jurist from the caption.
Justice Brobson did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lerner, N. v. Fox, I., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lerner-n-v-fox-i-pa-2022.