Lerman v. Northeast Permanente Medical Group, P. C.

212 A.D.2d 672, 622 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1733
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 21, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 212 A.D.2d 672 (Lerman v. Northeast Permanente Medical Group, P. C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lerman v. Northeast Permanente Medical Group, P. C., 212 A.D.2d 672, 622 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1733 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the [673]*673defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Walsh, J.H.O.), dated February 22, 1993, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants in the principal sum of $9,125.25.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by (1) deleting therefrom the provisions in favor of the plaintiff and against the appellants Barney D. Newman, M.D., Adrienne Weiss-Harrison, M.D., and William Zarowitz, M.D., and (2) deleting therefrom the words "with interest thereon from the 30th day of September, 1989,” and substituting therefor the words "with interest thereon from December 31, 1989”; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The trial court’s finding that Northeast Permanente Medical Group, P. C. was liable for breach of contract is supported by the evidence. We modify the judgment, however, because the individual defendants Barney D. Newman, M.D., Adrienne Weiss-Harrison, M.D., and William Zarowitz, M.D., who were members of the corporate defendant’s board of directors, cannot be held liable merely because they were board members (see, Murtha v Yonkers Child Care Assn., 45 NY2d 913, 915).

As the earliest ascertainable date that the plaintiff’s cause of action existed was December 31, 1989, when the "divisible surplus” was distributed, interest must be computed from that date (see, CPLR 5001 [b]). Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

High View Fund, L.P. v. Hall
27 F. Supp. 2d 420 (S.D. New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 A.D.2d 672, 622 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lerman-v-northeast-permanente-medical-group-p-c-nyappdiv-1995.