Lerma, Ex Parte Guadalupe

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 16, 2009
DocketAP-76,222
StatusPublished

This text of Lerma, Ex Parte Guadalupe (Lerma, Ex Parte Guadalupe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lerma, Ex Parte Guadalupe, (Tex. 2009).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,222

EX PARTE GUADALUPE LERMA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 40504 IN THE 268th DISTRICT COURT FROM FORT BEND COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual

assault of a child (count one), indecency with a child (count two), and indecency with a child (count

three) and sentenced to, respectively, thirty-three years’, twenty-five years’, and thirty years’

imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Lerma v. State, Nos. 01-06-

00083-CR, 01-06-00113-CR, and 01-06-00114-CR (Tex. Crim. App.–Houston [1st Dist.], delivered

March, 2007, no pet.). 2

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance

because counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed

to advise him of his right to petitions for discretionary review pro se.

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit and our

independent review of the record, we find that appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that

his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of his right to file petitions for

discretionary review pro se. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We also

find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file out-of-time petitions for

discretionary review of the judgments of the First Court of Appeals in Cause Nos. 01-06-00083-CR,

01-06-00113-CR, and 01-06-00114-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case No. 40504 from the

268th Judicial District Court of Fort Bend County. Applicant shall file his petitions for discretionary

review with the Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

All other claims are dismissed. Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

Delivered: September 16, 2009 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Wilson
956 S.W.2d 25 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Torres
943 S.W.2d 469 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lerma, Ex Parte Guadalupe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lerma-ex-parte-guadalupe-texcrimapp-2009.