Lerdal v. Fotioo

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Lerdal v. Fotioo

533 N.W.2d 623, 1995 Minn. LEXIS 591, 1995 WL 396868

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided June 30, 1995·No. No. C8-95-803·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Becky Lerdal and Becky Lerdal & Associates for further review be, and the same is, granted for the limited purpose of reversing the order of dismissal of the appeal by the court of appeals filed on May 9, 1995. The appeal is reinstated and the matter is remanded to the court of appeals for its consideration and disposition of the appeal on its merits. See City of Shorewood v. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, 533 N.W.2d 402 (Minn., 1995); Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529, 294 N.W. 845 (1940).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alexander M. Keith Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Becky Lerdal and Becky Lerdal & Associates for further review be, and the same is, granted for the limited purpose of reversing the order of dismissal of the appeal by the court of appeals filed on May 9, 1995. The appeal is reinstated and the matter is remanded to the court of appeals for its consideration and disposition of the appeal on its merits. See City of Shorewood v. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, 533 N.W.2d 402 (Minn., 1995); Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529, 294 N.W. 845 (1940).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alexander M. Keith Chief Justice

Lerdal v. Fotioo, 533 N.W.2d 623, 1995 Minn. LEXIS 591, 1995 WL 396868 (Mich. 1995).

Pincite

533 N.W.2d 623 (Lerdal v. Fotioo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related