Leppla v. Leppla

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Leppla v. Leppla

404 So. 2d 813, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21234

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 8, 1981

DocketNo. AB-355

StatusPublished

This text of 404 So. 2d 813 (Leppla v. Leppla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leppla v. Leppla, 404 So. 2d 813, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21234 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the final judgment of dissolution of marriage on appeal, the trial court failed to set forth the determination of which party would make the mortgage payments and bear the expenses for repair and maintenance on the marital home. We remand for the trial judge to make such determination. If the trial judge should determine that the wife is to make all such payments, exclusive of the husband, provisions shall be made for increasing her equity in the property. Rubino v. Rubino, 372 So.2d 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

We have considered the other points raised in this appeal and find them to be without merit.

Accordingly, this cause is AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED and REMANDED in part for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

McCORD and MILLS, JJ., and AGNER, ROYCE, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In the final judgment of dissolution of marriage on appeal, the trial court failed to set forth the determination of which party would make the mortgage payments and bear the expenses for repair and maintenance on the marital home. We remand for the trial judge to make such determination. If the trial judge should determine that the wife is to make all such payments, exclusive of the husband, provisions shall be made for increasing her equity in the property. Rubino v. Rubino, 372 So.2d 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

We have considered the other points raised in this appeal and find them to be without merit.

Accordingly, this cause is AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED and REMANDED in part for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

McCORD and MILLS, JJ., and AGNER, ROYCE, Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

404 So. 2d 813, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leppla-v-leppla-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack