Lepolo (Tuly) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 12, 2021
Docket83291
StatusPublished

This text of Lepolo (Tuly) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State) (Lepolo (Tuly) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lepolo (Tuly) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State), (Neb. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TH-E STATE OF NEVADA

TULY LEPOLO, No, 83291 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED CLARK; THE HONORABLE MICHAEL VILLANL DISTRICT J LLDG E; AN D TH E AUG 1 2 2021 HONORABLE DAVID BARKER, ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK • PREME COURT SENIOR JUDGE, BY DEPUTY CLERK. Respondents, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges district court oral decisions denying a motion for bail and a renewed motion for bail. It is petitioner's burden to demonstrate that extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 998, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). As part of petitioner's burden, it was his obligation to provide an appendix that includes all records essential to understand the issues raised in the petition. See NRAP 21(a)(4); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228-29, 88 P.3d at 844. This obligation included, at a minimum. contacting real party in interest and the district court to facilitate preparation of the court's order and, if such an order was not promptly forthcoming, proposing his own order for the district court's review. See Rust v. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist., 103 Nev. 686, 689, 747 P.2d 1380, 1382 (1987) (explaining that a written order is essential to this court's review). Petitioner does not, however. argue

Soften Couar OF NEVADA

10) 1947A 460 or demonstrate that he made any such attempt to do so, instead merely indicating that no written order was entered. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

6-dt c„) . Hardesty

J. Parraguirre Cadish

cc: Chiefjudge, The Eighth judicial District Court Hon. David Barker, Senior Judge Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Special Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 101 1947A 04601e,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rust v. Clark County School District
747 P.2d 1380 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lepolo (Tuly) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lepolo-tuly-vs-dist-ct-state-nev-2021.