Lepman & Heggie v. Inter-State Produce Co.

205 Ill. App. 270, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 1095
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 16, 1917·No. Gen. No. 22,215·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Attachment, § 9*—when original action does not lie against nonresident. The fact that the defendant in an original attachment proceeding is a nonresident does not alter the rule that such an attachment will not lie to recover unliquidated damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lepman & Heggie v. Inter-State Produce Co., 205 Ill. App. 270, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 1095 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

205 Ill. App. 270 (Lepman & Heggie v. Inter-State Produce Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

FIRST NAT'L BK. & T. CO. OF BARRINGTON v. Maas
327 N.E.2d 205 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1975)
First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Maas
327 N.E.2d 205 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1975)
In Re Silver
109 F. Supp. 200 (E.D. Illinois, 1953)
Harry B. Smead Co. ex rel. Scandinavian Seed Co. v. J. Oliver Johnson, Inc.
262 Ill. App. 385 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1931)
Phelps v. Columbia Phonograph Broadcasting System, Inc.
255 Ill. App. 294 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1929)
Hoosier Veneer Co. v. Trusts & Guarantee Co.
283 F. 1 (Seventh Circuit, 1921)
Hart-Parr Co. v. Pratt
272 F. 471 (Seventh Circuit, 1921)
O'Pizzi v. Valley Fruit Co.
213 Ill. App. 162 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1919)
American Lumber Co. v. Leach
207 Ill. App. 62 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1917)