Lepeska v. Masek
This text of 92 N.W. 1131 (Lepeska v. Masek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action in conversion for tbe recovery of the value of a car load of potatoes. Yerdict for plaintiff, who appeals from an order of the court granting a new trial.
Plaintiff introduced evidence tending to show that, after the potatoes reached their destination and were found to be somewhat frost-bitten, a new agreement was entered into, by which defendants agreed to sort over the potatoes, and sell the good ones at the price named in the original contract. Upon the other hand defendants testified that the agreement was to dispose of the carload lot in the best manner possible. The evidence was conflicting, and not so palpably and manifestly in favor of the verdict as to warrant a reversal of the order granting a new trial.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 N.W. 1131, 88 Minn. 55, 1902 Minn. LEXIS 692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lepeska-v-masek-minn-1902.