Leow v. Fetherston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Leow v. Fetherston

165 A.D. 955

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 165 A.D. 955 (Leow v. Fetherston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leow v. Fetherston, 165 A.D. 955 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for an alternative writ of mandamus denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that there is no issue presented by the papers herein calling for the granting of any writ. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for an alternative writ of mandamus denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that there is no issue presented by the papers herein calling for the granting of any writ. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 A.D. 955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leow-v-fetherston-nyappdiv-1914.