Leoso v. Ripley

High Court of American Samoa

Leoso v. Ripley

1 Am. Samoa 310

CourtHigh Court of American Samoa

DecidedFebruary 13, 1919

DocketNo. 20-1918

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Am. Samoa 310 (Leoso v. Ripley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering High Court of American Samoa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leoso v. Ripley, 1 Am. Samoa 310 (amsamoa 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

This cause coming on to be heard before their Honors A. M. Noble and Molioo, on the 13th day of February, 1919, and it appearing to the Court that the land “LESOLO” is a portion of the land “LEGAOA”, which said land was the subject matter in controversy in that certain case entitled Toomata v. the People of Leone, 1 A.S.R. 142 (1906), which said case was tried before the High Court of American Samoa on the 4th day of May, 1906.

And it further appearing to the Court from the Judgment rendered in said cause that the plaintiff, Leoso, was adjudged not entitled to any portion of said land.

It is therefore ordered, considered and adjudged that the plaintiff, Leoso, take nothing by this action.

It is further ordered, considered and adjudged by the Court that the costs of this action, viz.; $20.00 be paid by the plaintiff, Leoso.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

This cause coming on to be heard before their Honors A. M. Noble and Molioo, on the 13th day of February, 1919, and it appearing to the Court that the land “LESOLO” is a portion of the land “LEGAOA”, which said land was the subject matter in controversy in that certain case entitled Toomata v. the People of Leone, 1 A.S.R. 142 (1906), which said case was tried before the High Court of American Samoa on the 4th day of May, 1906.

And it further appearing to the Court from the Judgment rendered in said cause that the plaintiff, Leoso, was adjudged not entitled to any portion of said land.

It is therefore ordered, considered and adjudged that the plaintiff, Leoso, take nothing by this action.

It is further ordered, considered and adjudged by the Court that the costs of this action, viz.; $20.00 be paid by the plaintiff, Leoso.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Am. Samoa 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leoso-v-ripley-amsamoa-1919.