Home/California Supreme Court/Leos v. Darden Rests.

Leos v. Darden Rests.

372 P.3d 902, 203 Cal. Rptr. 3d 516
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJune 29, 2016
DocketNo. S212511.
StatusPublished

This text of 372 P.3d 902 (Leos v. Darden Rests.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leos v. Darden Rests., 372 P.3d 902, 203 Cal. Rptr. 3d 516 (Cal. 2016).

Opinion

Dismissed and remanded to CA 2/1. Review in the above-captioned matter, which was granted and held for Baltazar v. Forever 21, Inc. (2016) 62 Cal.4th 1237, 200 Cal.Rptr.3d 7, 367 P.3d 6, is hereby dismissed. (Rule 8.528(b)(1).)

CORRIGAN, J., was absent and did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baltazar v. Forever 21, Inc.
367 P.3d 6 (California Supreme Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
372 P.3d 902, 203 Cal. Rptr. 3d 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leos-v-darden-rests-cal-2016.