Leopoldstadt v. Kann

150 A.D. 914

This text of 150 A.D. 914 (Leopoldstadt v. Kann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leopoldstadt v. Kann, 150 A.D. 914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The plaintiff should have been permitted to amend his complaint. Although he has been a little slow in discovering the deficiencies of his present complaint, there is no suggestion that he has been guilty of bad faith. (Muller v. City of Philadelphia, 113 App. Div. 92; People v. Ostrander, 144 id. 860.) The order appealed from must, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted upon payment by plaintiff of thirty dollars trial fee and ten dollars costs of motion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted on payment by plaintiff of thirty dollars trial fee and ten dollars costs of motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Muller v. City of Philadelphia
113 A.D. 92 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 A.D. 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leopoldstadt-v-kann-nyappdiv-1912.